Skip to content

Discuss Critically The Strain Theory Of Crime And Deviance Essays

The functionalist and strain theories both show some relationship between deviance and social structure. While the functionalist theory seeks to explain the functions of deviance and crime in society, the strain theory helps to deepen our understanding by connecting these ideas to the antagonistic relationship between cultural goals and institutionalised means.

Functionalists believe deviance functions as a tool for society to define (or redefine) morality (Brym and Lie, 2007:195). Strain theory is closely entwined - of the adaptations, rebellion and innovation have the highest entrenchment in criminal activity, while ritualism and retreatism are more likely considered as social diversions or social deviations. Conformity involves breaching no social norms (Brym and Lie, 2007:196), demonstrating how strain theory offers further insight to the functionalist views using the different adaptations that vary in the levels of moral outrage they cause.

Both theories point to the building of social solidarity and development of social change as an outcome of deviance and crime (Brym and Lie, 2007:195). When there is conformity, social identities are fostered; in the face of rebellion and innovation, this group identity is strengthened or reshaped. This is important for the progress and daily function of society.

One critique of the strain theory is that it overemphasizes the role of social class in crime and deviance (Brym and Lie, 2007:197). Strain theory applies best to lower classes as they struggle most with the lack of resources to reconcile their goals. However, if we examine the wide spectrum of deviant and criminal acts, strain theory account inadequately for crimes beyond the narrow scope of street crimes; crimes considered as white-collar crimes are more rampant among the middle and upper-classes who suffice materially.

The motivations behind white-collar crime offenders can be sophisticated. Functionalist and strain theory assume people’s inherent goodness; people are driven by social factors to crime and deviance. However this is not always true. The control theory balances this by providing an opposing perspective. By assuming all people are bad it suggests people will commit crime and deviant acts unless social controls such as policing were in place (Brym and Lie, 2007:198). This better explains cases of many highly-educated officials embezzling company funds thinking they would not get caught; they do not need the money but their motivations are that of greed.

The functionalist and strain theory provides the most comprehensive explanation of the relationship between macro social structure and deviance and crime. However, it neglects the interpersonal and intrapersonal aspects which can be examined through the symbolic interactionist approach. This approach deals incorporates more intricately with the idea of socialization – how unique peer groups influence the meanings and symbols an individual attaches to certain behaviours or ideals. For example using the labelling theory, it demonstrates how an individual within his social circle (family, friends…) could be labelled as deviant based on their values they impose on him (Brym and Lie, 2007:198). This takes incorporates the differences in social dynamics across different peer groups in society, allowing for processes like resocialisation to interpret deviance. The metamorphosis of culture, primary and secondary socialization also enhance the socio-cultural context of deviance and crime – in this aspect, the functionalist (focusing on macro structures) framework is more rigid and too general.

The learning theory also aptly illustrates the above through Sutherland’s differential association theory which further extends the idea of people’s propensity to turn to deviance and crime having been socialised in contexts with differing levels of exposure to it (Brym and Lie, 2007:197). In fact this theory successfully bridges the gap between social class differences, unlike the functionalist and strain theory whose ideas resonate best with the lower classes.

However, the drawback of labeling theory is how it acts as a self-fulfilling prophecy. When judges and policemen operate, they are now primed to label certain stereotypes of individuals as deviants and criminals. This stigmatization has a direct and often unfair impact on the individuals labeled as deviant. Typically, these would be those fringe members of the in group, or the out group being labeled by the reference group. These individuals are relatively powerless – a phenomenon best explained by the conflict theory.

The conflict theory originating from Marx, speaks of the struggle between the powerful (bourgeoisie) trying to remain lord of the powerless (referring to the working class; proletariat) who fight to have a better life. This macro structure keeps society functioning orderly. When applied to deviance and crime, the powerful (often the elites and wealthy of society who are the often reference group) label the powerless as deviants or criminals (Brym and Lie, 2007:199). In reality, many wealthy politicians illustrate this when they label individuals who pose threats to their authority as criminals. However, because they have the resources, they are able to buy themselves out of crime, an example of corruption. This perpetuates the cycle of labeling perpetuates when the powerful face less severe punishment (compared to the powerless). This could complement the functionalist theory, suggesting how moral outrage is very much influenced by the powerful – who not only monopolise resources but also craft the rules about deviance and crime in order to best suit their agenda – which is to remain at the top rung of society. We also see how the conflict theory directly applies to strain theory which applies best to the lower classes; it is this conflict which predisposes the lower classes to lack access to the resources to realize the dreams, causing them to resort to street crime as a solution.

From the perspective of feminism, functionalist and strain theories fail to enlighten us about crime and deviance with regards to gender inequality. As most societies are patriarchal, more crimes committed by men against women, but there lacks sufficient insight to explain this. The feminist theory proposes to examine deviance and crime from the angle of gender, borrowing ideas from gender roles and differences to explain deviance and crime in society. This is one drawback of the strain and functionalist theories – the inability to explain the gender inequality.

Today, deviance and crime has taken a new spin – globalization has widened the rich-poor income gap, stratifying societies into more distinct classes, which may increase the relevance of strain and functionalist, and even conflict theories of deviance and crime. However, with internet, and ease of travel, there is not only new types of crime like cybercrime, but also the changing and dilution of population demographics, and blurring of social classes, making strain functionalist theories harder to apply across societies. In Singapore, non-residents comprise 22% of the population (Singapore Department of Statistics, Feb 2008). In applying the labeling theory to Singapore, foreigners and migrants, particularly those engaged in hard labour jobs are often stigmatized due to their race, and are often unfairly associated with deviant behavior.

With the increasingly equalitarian treatment of both genders, feminist theory can help to explain us to understand the changing dynamics of female deviance, which strain and functionalist cannot adequately tackle.

As societies show a trend - moving from collectivist cultures to more individualistic culture, individuals are being socialized in different ways, and symbolic interactionists theories may provide additional insight into deviance and crime that the strain and functionalist theories may overlook.

Anomie And General Strain Theories Of Crime

Anomie/Strain Theory Historical Background
The theoretical framework of strain theory can be credited to sociologist Emile Durkheim. Durkheim research on formed a platform for other sociologist to further develop strain theories of crime. One of which is Robert Merton. One of Durkheim’s major works that opened the door to further research on strain theories was his book, Suicide. In this book Durkheim sough to understand the why led to one’s own self-destruction. Emile Durkheim studied suicide rates and its association with crisis. Durkheim noticed trends in suicide rates that were associated with economic prosperity and economic crisis.
“According to Durkheim, the state of normlessness that people find themselves in as a result of a crisis is referred to as anomie.” (Paternoster, Bachman, 2001, p.142) Anomie occurs when one is put in an uncomfortable position because of goals not being met. Anomie can occur during times of financial crisis, death, or family crisis. Durkheim also looked at the difference in suicide rates amongst Catholics and Protestants. He found that suicide rates were higher amongst Protestants than Catholics. In Durkheim’s finding in studying suicide rates he came up with a model for anomie/strain. His model says that strain causes anomie, which in turn causes an individual to want to commit suicide or other deviant acts.
Development of Anomie Strain Theory
Sociologist Robert K. Merton picked up on Durkheim’s concepts of anomie and strain to develop his own perspective. He is most credited for the development of this theory. Merton based his version of the theory on the fact that American society puts its value in material wealth and that all people should strive to attain material wealth. “In Merton’s view, American society is just such a malintegrated and anomic society because we do emphasize goal attainment far more than we emphasize using the approved or correct means to attain goals, such as through education and hard work.” (Paternoster, Bachman, 2001, 144) In Merton’s model of the anomie/strain theory he says that anomie causes strain, which in turn causes crime and deviance. The difference in Durkheim and Merton’s model of the theory is Durkheim’s model puts emphasis on the failure to regulate the goals and Merton’s model puts emphasis on the failure to regulate the means.
In Merton’s version of the anomie/strain theory he pointed out five adaptations to strain: conformity, innovation, rebellion, ritualism, and retreatism. Conformity means that one accepts both the goal and the means. They may try to attain the goals with limited means. This adaptation is most common in society. Innovation means that one accepts the goals but rejects the means. This individual has a “by any means necessary” attitude when it comes to the attainment of goals. Rebellion means that one rejects both the means and the goals. They may substitution those goals and means with their own goals and means. Ritualism means that one rejects the...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Assess Marxist Theories of Crime and Deviance

626 words - 3 pages Marxism is a social structural theory. This means that marxists, like functionalists believe that society and the way it is structured are the main causes of crime. Unlike functionalists, who argue that crime and deviance are inevitable in all kinds of society, marxists argue that crime is only inevitable in capitalist societies and that capitalism by its very nature is criminogenic. Marxists view law as part of the superstructure, which in...

Theories of Crime Essay

1459 words - 6 pages Why do people commit crime? This is relatively strong topic discussed by sociologists that believe criminal or deviant behaviors are not because of ones physical characteristic. This essay will...

Theories of Crime

2151 words - 9 pages Many theories of crime are macro theories, which are used to explain crime based on a large group of people or society. While macro theories are the predominant type of theory used to explain crime, there are also a variety of “individual”, or micro, factors which are equally important. Two such individual factors s are maternal cigarette smoking (MCS) and cognitive ability, or Intelligence Quotient (IQ). MCS has been shown to negatively...

Theories of Crime

960 words - 4 pages Juvenile delinquency is a social issue that has been without much success with regards to its redress. This has mostly been contributed to failures to fully understand the concept. The best way to address such an issue can only be through the understanding of the causation mechanism that has led to the situation. There is a dire need to get an understanding of the causes of juvenile delinquency within the society being the only way to adequately...

Sociology:Outline and assess Structuralist theories of crime and deviance.

589 words - 2 pages All Structuralist theories of crime and deviance seem to suggest that crime is socially constructed rather than focused on the individual.Albert Cohen, combining Structuralist and sub cultural theories drew on

Theories of Causation of Crime and Its Solution

1232 words - 5 pages If we studied through the history of criminal theory, spiritual and natural theories are taken as major theories of causation of crime. During medieval period, spiritual explanations were taken as punishment given by god for doing wrong things and any natural disasters like flood, fires, etc were evaluated as curse of high power. In modern period, the basic theories of causation of crime are...

Jensen's, Gardner's, and Sternberg's theories of applications in measurement of general mental ability in the workplace.

857 words - 3 pages According to Jensen (1998), the g factor is the highest-order common factor that can be extracted in a hierarchical factor analysis from a large battery of diverse tests of an assortment of cognitive abilities. Spearman thought of g as "mental energy" that could be applied to mental tasks (Jensen, 1998).According to Spearman, "individual differences in performance on any mental task result from two sources: differences in the amount of...

An overview of Psychological Theories of Crime

1391 words - 6 pages Criminal behavior has a multitude of theories attempting to explain its origins ranging form the bizarre to the mundane. These include everything from tattoos causing crime, to crime being caused by poor parenting. There are a large number of theories attempting to explain crime through empirical methods from a multitude of disciplines - sociology, biology, and the area of specificity for this paper - psychology. Psychological methods...

Labelling Theories' Contribution to the Sociological Understanding of Crime and Deviance

1575 words - 6 pages Labelling Theories' Contribution to the Sociological Understanding of Crime and Deviance Becker is the main sociologist studying labelling theory on deviance, he argues that 'social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance.' Meaning acts only become deviant when observers perceive it and define it as deviant. An example of this would be the act of nudity, it is accepted in the ...

Critically evaluate biological and sociological theories and discuss how these contribute to the explanation for the occurrence of crime

4534 words - 18 pages MSc In Security & Risk ManagementMarch 2010 IntakeCritically evaluate biological and sociological theories and discuss how these contribute to the explanation for the occurrence of crime.4150 wordsAre criminals born or are criminals made? This is a question that many criminologists have researched into and tried and come to a conclusive answer. However the majority are divided into two main...

19th Century Theories in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

2539 words - 10 pages 19th Century Theories in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment   "I teach you the Superman. Man is something that has to be surpassed. What have you done to surpass him?" These words said by Friedrich Nietzsche encompass the theories present in Dostoevsky's nineteenth century novel, Crime and Punishment. Fyodor Dostoevsky, living a life of suffering himself, created the character of Raskolnikov with the preconceptions of his...