+ All Machiavelli Prince Essays:
- Sophocles' Antigone – Comparing the Symbolic Alignment Utilized by Creon and President George Bush
- Whistleblowers Compared to Edward Snowden
- Reasoning of Human Nature
- Issues of Race in The Prince of Egypt
- Study Guide to Renaissance Humanism
- Value Pluralism and Absolute Moral Judgments
- Prince Edward Island - Essay
- Beauty and the Beast by Mme Le Prince de Beaumont
- Burberry Case Study
- Lust, Loss, and Immorality in the Little Mermaid
- Machiavelli In American Politics
- Great Rulers and What Makes Them Successful
- The Film Adaptation Ever After Versus The Brothers Grimm Adaptation "Aschenputtle"
- The Tragic Hero of Hamlet
- Adolf Hitler's Machiavellian Strategy
- Honor in Prince Hal
- An Analysis of the Gossamer Years
- Movie Review on Mr.Holland Opus
- Propaganda by Radio in the Third Reich
- Tupac Shakur
- Shi Huangdi and his Legacy in China
- Political Action and Morality in Machiavellian Times
- Summary of Chapter 15: Personality and Social Interaction, from Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge About Human Nature
- The Varying Notions of Authority and Challenging Authority
- The Comic and the Serious in Shakespeare's 'Henry IV'
- Is Power Central to Understanding Politics?
- Suge Being Responsible for Tupac's Death and is Tupac Really Dead
- Film Study Prince
- Sundiata: An Epic of Old Mali
- The Medici Influence and the Italian Renaissance
- Desiderius Erasmus - "prince Of The Humanists"
- Cinderella/Everafter Comparison
- Timeless Aspects of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark and Trifles
- Already Gone: The Key Character Prince Carter
- Machiavelli's Views on Leadership- It Is Better to be Feared as a Leader than Loved
- The Life and Works of Niccolo Machiavelli
- Are the Political Ideas of Machiavelli Still Relevant in Today's World?
- The Influences of Selected Political Writings by Machiavelli and Leviathan by Hobbes
- Modern Day Cinderella
- Lion and the Fox Metaphor in Machiavelli's The Prince
- Comparison of Lao-tzu and Machiavelli
- The Prince
- Comparing Christian Liberty, Utopia, and The Prince
- Catherine de Medici and Obsession Over Power
- Imoinda's Modernity: Aphra Behn's Enactment of Conjugal Marriage in Oroonoko, or the Royal Slave
- Different Viewpoints on Human Nature
- The Ideal State of Today
- Morality, Virtue and the Public Figure
- Political Testament of Cardinal Richelieu
- The Golden Bird: A Story Rewrite
- Strategic Management and Matrix
- Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince and The Discourses
- Ir Theory Article Review-Doyle
- The Happy Prince and Other Tales Book Summary
- There Are Many Critical Interpretations of Iago’s Character. Was He a ‘Skillful Villain’? or Perhaps He Was a ‘Mysterious Creature of Unlimited Cynicism’? or Was He Simply a ‘Wronged Man’? More Sinned Against Than Sinning?
- The Passing of the Crown by Shakespeare's Henries
- A Man For All Season And Machiavelli's Doctrine: Reiteration Of History
- The Genius of Hamlet, the Very Sane Prince of Denmark
- Gilgamesh: A Mythical Hero
- Humanism The Renaissance And M
- Characteristics of a Machiavel in The Spanish Tragedy and Hamlet
- Glorifying the Tudor Dynasty: Shakespeare's Richard III and the Perfect Villain
- Ideas of Rulers in "Tao-te Ching" and "The Prince"
- Louis Xiv: a Machiavellian Ruler?
- Iago's Motives in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice
- Tartuffe: Truth and Religious Teachings
- Book Review: The Prince
- Louis XIV's Similarities to Machiavelli's The Prince
- Separating Political Conduct and Personal Morality in Niccolò Machiavelli's, The Prince
- Prince Hal in Shakespeare's Henriad
- Machiavelli's The Prince and its Role in Politics in the Renaissance
- Renaissance Figures
- The Book of the City of Ladies
- The Roles of Power and Truth
- Movie Review - the King's Speech
- Arthur vs Beowulf
- Lao Tzu's Teachings on Effective Government
- Disney and Traditional Stereotypes
- Snow White Story Telling
- The Influences of Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince on Richard the Third
History does not tell us if Lorenzo bothered to read the book. But if he did, he would have learned from his would-be friend that there are, in fact, no friends in politics.
“The Prince” is a manual for those who wish to win and keep power. The Renaissance was awash in such how-to guides, but Machiavelli’s was different. To be sure, he counsels a prince on how to act toward his enemies, using force and fraud in war. But his true novelty resides in how we should think about our friends. It is at the book’s heart, in the chapter devoted to this issue, that Machiavelli proclaims his originality.
Set aside what you would like to imagine about politics, Machiavelli writes, and instead go straight to the truth of how things really work, or what he calls the “effectual truth.” You will see that allies in politics, whether at home or abroad, are not friends.
Perhaps others had been deluded about the distinction because the same word in Italian — “amici” — is used for both concepts. Whoever imagines allies are friends, Machiavelli warns, ensures his ruin rather than his preservation.
There may be no students more in need of this insight, yet less likely to accept it, than contemporary Americans, both in and outside the government. Like the political moralizers Machiavelli aims to subvert, we still believe a leader should be virtuous: generous and merciful, honest and faithful.
Yet Machiavelli teaches that in a world where so many are not good, you must learn to be able to not be good. The virtues taught in our secular and religious schools are incompatible with the virtues one must practice to safeguard those same institutions. The power of the lion and the cleverness of the fox: These are the qualities a leader must harness to preserve the republic.
For such a leader, allies are friends when it is in their interest to be. (We can, with difficulty, accept this lesson when embodied by a ; we have even greater difficulty when it is taught by, say, .) What’s more, Machiavelli says, leaders must at times inspire fear not only in their foes but even in their allies — and even in their own ministers.
What would Machiavelli have thought when apologized for the fiasco of his health care rollout? Far from earning respect, he would say, all he received was contempt. As one of Machiavelli’s favorite exemplars, Cesare Borgia, grasped, heads must sometimes roll. (Though in Borgia’s case, he meant it quite literally, though he preferred slicing bodies in half and leaving them in a public square.)
Machiavelli has long been called a teacher of evil. But the author of “The Prince” never urged evil for evil’s sake. The proper aim of a leader is to maintain his state (and, not incidentally, his job). Politics is an arena where following virtue often leads to the ruin of a state, whereas pursuing what appears to be vice results in security and well-being. In short, there are never easy choices, and prudence consists of knowing how to recognize the qualities of the hard decisions you face and choosing the less bad as what is the most good.
Those of us who see the world, if not in Manichaean, at least in Hollywoodian terms, will recoil at such claims. Perhaps we are right to do so, but we would be wrong to dismiss them out of hand. If Machiavelli’s teaching concerning friends and allies in politics is deeply disconcerting, it is because it goes to the bone of our religious convictions and moral conventions. This explains why he remains as reviled, but also as revered, today as he was in his own age.Continue reading the main story